Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement - Preamble
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Rater Errors among Peer-Assessors: Applying the Many-Facet Rasch Measurement Model
In this study, the researcher used the many-facet Rasch measurement model (MFRM) to detect two pervasive rater errors among peer-assessors rating EFL essays. The researcher also compared the ratings of peer-assessors to those of teacher assessors to gain a clearer understanding of the ratings of peer-assessors. To that end, the researcher used a fully crossed design in which all peer-assessors ...
متن کاملAnalysis of rater severity on written expression exam using Many Faceted Rasch Measurement
This paper describes how a Many Faceted Rasch Measurement (MFRM) approach can be applied to performance assessment focusing on rater analysis. The article provides an introduction to MFRM, a description of MFRM analysis procedures, and an example to illustrate how to examine the effects of various sources of variability on test takers’ performance on a writing test by means of a MFRM analysis. ...
متن کاملDetecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: part I.
The purpose of this two-part paper is to introduce researchers to the many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) approach for detecting and measuring rater effects. The researcher will learn how to use the Facets (Linacre, 2001) computer program to study five effects: leniency/severity, central tendency, randomness, halo, and differential leniency/severity. Part 1 of the paper provides critical backgr...
متن کاملMany-Facet Rasch Measurement
This chapter provides an introductory overview of many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM). Broadly speaking, MFRM refers to a class of measurement models that extend the basic Rasch model by incorporating more variables (or facets) than the two that are typically included in a test (i.e., examinees and items), such as raters, scoring criteria, and tasks. Throughout the chapter, a sample of rating d...
متن کاملA Comparison of the Results of Many-Facet Rasch Analyses Based on Crossed and Judge Pair Designs
Citation: İlhan, M. (2016). A comparison of the results of many-facet Rasch analyses based on crossed and judge pair designs. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 579-601. 1 Correspondence to: Mustafa İlhan (PhD), Department of Primary Education, Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, Dicle University, Diyarbakır Turkey. Email: [email protected] Abstract The aim of this study was to c...
متن کامل